RT-114 was charged with developing a breakthrough approach to compensate contractors based upon the overall business success of a venture. It is important to note that compensation was interpreted broadly to include reward, recognition, payment, future opportunities, expanded roles, and reduced risk. “Breakthrough approach” was defined as a dramatic improvement, a step change in performance, and/or the fundamental rethinking of concepts.
The team compiled an overview of current industry practices, analyzed survey results, and held a national workshop to explore topics that include:
- Business objectives of the project
- Mechanisms used to communicate objectives to project personnel
- Development of compensation plan
- Details of compensation plan, including contract terms
- Impact of compensation scheme on performance
- Views on compensation method effectiveness and improvements
Traditional engineering and construction contracts perpetuate competing interests between owners and contractors. As such, typical contracting strategies, such as alliances, team autonomy, and incentive contracting, do not always foster a successful project partnership.
The application of innovative contractor compensation strategies should not be considered an “end all” solution to project performance improvement. Such strategies instead should be considered one more important tool in a project team “tool kit” to be applied in conjunction with other CII best practices such as partnering, team building, team alignment, open communications, setting project objectives, and pre-project planning.
2 : Compensation Plans Need To Be Individualized
No single breakthrough strategy or set of metrics was applicable to all projects. The development of contractor compensation plans that lead to owner success is highly individualized to the specific project and the project leaders that create the contract. (RS114-1, p. v)
3 : Compensation Strategies
The 32 innovative contractor compensation strategies, developed through 14 case studies and a national workshop, were grouped into the following 10 categories. (RS114-1, p. 3)
- Development of Incentive Plans – Joint development of the incentive plan promotes sharing of information and leads to more efficient contracting relationships.
- Selection of Performance Measures – Performance areas selected for inclusion in an incentive plan should correlate to key results for the owner and must sufficiently span the contractor’s performance so that important aspects of performance are not neglected.
- Application of Performance Measures to Incentive Calculation – Incentives can be attached to both objective and subjective performance measures.
- Project Team Member Incentives – Incentives paid to individual team members often may be integral to contractor corporate incentive plans.
- Incentive Effect Improvement through Increased Contractor Control – Incentive effectiveness is directly proportional to the control that the contractor has over those areas covered by incentives. Therefore, the owner’s choice of project execution strategies is a critical ingredient to the overall effectiveness of an incentive plan.
- Maintenance of Incentive Targets in Long-Term Relationships – Long-term relationships, such as partnering arrangements or annual maintenance agreements, permit the use of some innovative contracting methods.
- Promoting Long-Term Contractor Focus on Owner Objectives – Traditionally, owner objectives are longer-term than those of the contractor. Some case studies revealed instances where owners, through innovative strategies, attempted to focus contractor’s interest for the longer term.
- Future Work as a Motivator – One long-term objective of contractors is to secure repeat work from clients. This objective can provide a useful basis for incentives.
- Alternative Compensation Units – Variations in cost-reimbursable units were found to be effective.
- Cash Flow Enhancements – Variable cash flow arrangements can be used as an incentive for contractor performance.