Making Zero Rework A Reality: A Comparison of Zero Accident Methodology to Zero Rework and Quality M
Publication No
RR203-11
Type
Academic Document
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2006
Pages
82
Research Team
RT-203
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
Key Findings
Worker involvement is needed to resolve the continuing problem of rework. The lower level of craft worker involvement and lack of incentives based on quality are potential areas for improvement. (RR203-11, p. 18)
Tracking rework was very common on the study projects. Investigation of rework or defects was less common than for safety incidents.
Is there a near-miss and quality error reporting system that initiates investigations at the project site and by upper management? In general rework and quality investigations, except for a limited number of respondents, do not have as formal a reporting process which could be an area for improvement.
Quality errors and near-errors also require investigation and reporting. (RR203-11, p. 65)Filters & Tags
Knowledge Area
Best Practice
Project Phase
Project Function
Industry Group
Research Topic
Do It Right the First Time
Keywords
Quality,
Safety,
Rework,
Do It Right the First Time,
Cost Impact,
Construction Costs,
Quality-Error,
Construction Sites,
Execution Level,
Safety Management,
Pre-Project,
Field Errors,
Pre-Task,
rt203
Related Resources
Sign In
Don't have an account? Click here to register for one!
Ready to Become a member?