Skip to Content (custom)

Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Facility Benchmarking Summary Report, 2005-2009

Publication No
BMM2009-10
Type
Research & Development Product
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2009
Pages
44
Research Team
BM-Pharma
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

In 2008, the revenues of the U.S. pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing sector tallied up to $170 billion, an amount 69 percent higher than it was in 1998 (BEA, 2009). The pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry is characterized by high capital investment, technological sophistication, and competitive markets. In order to continue their success, pharmaceutical/ biotechnology companies invest heavily in their capital facilities every year. As a result, these firms are urged to adopt business strategies that add value to their facility delivery programs. Benchmarking is a technique widely accepted by various industries to improve project performance and is a critical component of a mature project delivery system. Benchmarking gives companies a comprehensive tool for gathering information and understanding project performance and best practices, both within and outside of their organizations. Whether the driver is cost, schedule, quality, or a combination of these drivers, benchmarking is essential to continuously improve the capital facility delivery process.

The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has found that benchmarking is most successful when implemented through a structured, systematic approach. Thus, CII has developed a statistically credible Benchmarking and Metrics (BM&M) program that can be easily integrated into the project delivery process. In the BM&M program, a company’s project performance and practice use are compared against those of a large number of projects from some of the industry&##8217;s most reputable firms. While traditional high-level metrics such as project cost growth and schedule growth assess performance and establish the value of best practices for a diverse membership, competitive benchmarking within an industry group requires industry-specific metrics. Because processes vary by industry, metrics must be attuned to the particular industry concerned. For example, the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry expends a disproportionate amount of resources in start-up due to strict requirements for installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and process qualification (PQ). Also, process equipment common to the pharmaceutical/biotechnology group influences total installed cost (TIC) metrics, and these costs tends to distort metrics such as process equipment cost/TIC. Pharmaceutical-specific metrics make it possible to measure performance for these projects in more absolute terms like costs in dollars, duration in weeks, and gross square footage (GSF).

While many pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies have developed their internal systems for tracking such metrics, a need exists for a publicly accessible system with common definitions that is capable of supporting external benchmarking. Such a system should be defined by the industry for use by the industry. To respond to this need, CII established the Pharmaceutical Benchmarking initiative.

Key Findings
A set of metrics was developed for the Pharmaceutical sector, including both absolute and relative metrics, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. (BMM2009-10, p. 5)

{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2fBMM2009_10Table2-5.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2fBMM2009_10Table3.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
Figure 10 shows that bulk manufacturing projects using Construction Management (CM) at Risk had the lowest unit cost while, for both secondary manufacturing and laboratory projects, Design-Build showed the advantage over other project delivery methods. (BMM2009-10, p. 20)
One of the major differences between pharmaceutical/biotechnology facilities and other capital projects is that pharmaceutical facilities consume a significant amount of resources during start-up due to the strict requirements of IQ, OQ, and PQ. Figure 12 presents the average IQ thru OQ Duration/Number of IQ and OQ Protocols by pharmaceutical project type.  (BMM2009-10, p. 22)
Compares actual cost with estimated cost. Based on the pharmaceutical/biotechnology projects in the CII database, pharmaceutical benchmarking participants have reduced their project cost growth substantially over the years. Figure 13 illustrates this trend for all projects, grouped according to the year in which they were started.
(BMM2009-10, p. 22)
PDRI is used to define how well the project scope was defined. A PDRI score of less than 200 is considered well defined – the lower the score the better the project scope definition. Figure 14 shows that the projects with a PDRI score of less than 200 experienced a significantly lower cost growth than the projects with a PDRI score greater than 200. (BMM2009-10, p. 23)
Project schedule growth measures the difference between actual schedule and planned schedule. See Figure 16, to notice a steadily improved schedule performance. (BMM2009-10, p. 24)
CII BM&M measures cost and schedule impact by a ratio of approved change order cost to Total Installed Cost (TIC), and approved schedule change to actual project duration, respectively. The projects with a PDRI score of less than 200 had a much lower cost and schedule impact due to change than did their counterparts. See Figures 18 and 19 for more understanding. (BMM2009-10, p. 26)
Over the years, the average TRIR for pharmaceutical/biotechnology facility projects has fluctuated, and the trend is not clear. See Figure 21, to notice that it is not going at a steady flow- the red dotted line is not straight. The years marking the x-axis in the figure refer to the mid-point of construction. Meanwhile, the overall CII membership reported a continuous improvement of TRIR from 1.02 to 0.68 during the same time period (CII 2008). (BMM2009-10, p. 27)
Previous research has determined that modularization potentially reduces project schedules and cost, and improves construction safety if used appropriately. In fact, the pharmaceutical database supports this finding. Since bulk manufacturing projects use more modularization, they tend to be built faster in terms of project duration (weeks)/1000 SF, as shown in Figure 27. (BMM2009-10, p. 29)
Filters & Tags
Knowledge Area
Best Practice
Industry Group
Research Topic
Benchmarking Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Team
Keywords
Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, Benchmarking, Installation Qualification, Operational Qualification, Process Qualification