Skip to Content (custom)

Needs Assessment for Construction Automation

Publication No
RS16-1
Type
Checklist/Flowchart/Matrix
Publication Date
Dec 01, 1991
Pages
34
Research Team
RT-016
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
The construction industry, as a form of manufacturing, is often considered archaic. Basic methods for physically putting work in place have not changed dramatically in the last 30 years. The availability of a large supply of trained construction worke
Key Findings
RT-16 has generated useful information in two categories. First, it has presented a methodology for determining tasks with good payback potential from construction automation. The methodology can be applied to any area of construction activity. Second, the study has identified several tasks that could benefit from automation in three important areas: structural steel erection, electrical fabrication and installation, and piping fabrication and erection. (RS16-1, p. 24)
The next logical step is to extend the needs assessment methodology presented here to include (1) an evaluation of the technology needed for automation, and (2) identification of other tasks to which any technically feasible solutions might also apply. The resulting procedure could help business, government, and academia direct support toward development of those devices which demonstrate the most favorable balance among user need, technical feasibility, and range of application. (RS16-1, p. 25)
RS16-1, Cost-Concern Matrix 

This simple four-quadrant matrix is used to plot tasks based on cost impact and concern rating. The matrix serves as a guide to help assess the relative need for automation among the tasks. (Note – this tool has been archived)  (RS16-1, p. 9)

Filters & Tags
Research Topic
Advanced Technological Systems
Keywords
Automation Feasibility, Cost-Concern Matrix, Needs Assessment Process, Individual Tasks, Advanced Construction Technology System, graphical simulation in construction, automated construction devices, rt16