Skip to Content (custom)
	A Guide to Regulatory Future-proofing for the Construction Industry

A Guide to Regulatory Future-proofing for the Construction Industry

Publication No
FR-PUI-01
Type
Printable assessment(s)
Publication Date
Jul 01, 2019
Pages
90
Research Team
RT-PUI-01
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
Regulations affect everyone involved in large capital projects: owners who need to determine the effects of a particular change to their assets, designers who need to assess how a change will impact design requirements, and contractors who need to ass
Key Findings
RT-PUI-01 identified essential knowledge for regulatory future proofing including: the process, key actions, and good practices for the future-proofing implementation.

Figure 1. Essential Knowledge for Future Proofing
The regulatory future-proofing process includes five overarching sub-processes:
  1. Regulatory horizon scanning
  2. Stakeholder engagement
  3. Risk and opportunity assessment
  4. Response strategy development
  5. Compliance implementation
These future-proofing sub-processes are implemented at different stages of regulatory development, such as the stages for pre-rulemaking, proposed rule development, and proposed rule publication, as well as the post-promulgation compliance period.

Figure 2. Sub-Process of the Process Map for Future Proofing
The RT-PUI-01 research identified key actions for each regulatory adaption sub-process, based on a synthesis of rich data and other information:

Regulatory horizon scanning
  • Be proactive in identifying regulatory changes.
  • Allocate resources to horizon scanning.
  • Develop mechanisms to navigate and manage information.
     
Stakeholder engagement
  • Engage all relevant stakeholders early and often.
  • Involve the right people at the right time.
  • Bring the right data and mindset to the conversation.
     
Risk and opportunity assessment
  • Start risk and opportunity assessment as early as possible in the pre-rulemaking stage.
  • Involve diverse multi-function teams at the different stages of risk analysis.
  • Disseminate and communicate regulatory risks and impacts internally.
  • Integrate regulatory risk analysis with both corporate and project risk assessment processes.
     
Developing a response strategy
  • Follow an adaptive process.
  • Start the final response strategy early.
  • Develop the response strategy based on clearly defined guiding principles and key considerations.
  • Maintain a balance between the no-regrets and wait-and-see approaches.
  • Assemble a diverse and experienced team.
     
Compliance implementation
  • Embed regulatory adaptation into the project development process.
  • Establish effective communications among stakeholders at different levels.
  • Continuously monitor compliance.
RT-PUI-01 identified four thematic areas that represent good practices for implementation. The team proposes that an organization should adopt these four areas as a guide for gauging its preparedness in dealing with regulatory changes:
  1. The earlier each adaptation stage starts, the more proactive the overall process will be in the long run.
  2. Managing regulatory changes requires a portfolio of flexible resources.
  3. Robust communication links with all relevant parties are key.
  4. Continuously evaluate current practices and review key actions to “mature” the overall process.

The final report discusses the importance of each thematic area, as well as its common struggles and plausible implementation actions.

RT-PUI-01 designed a Future-proofing Guide to assist any company that wishes to improve its practices, no matter where it sits on the spectrum, or any individual who wants to improve specific practices or just seeks a better understanding of the regulatory process, no matter where that person sits in an organization.

The Future-proofing Guide is organized into two main parts:

  1. The Regulatory Future-proofing Framework and Process Map outlines how companies generally identify and adapt to regulatory changes (i.e., “the process”). A general overview of the Future-proofing Framework is accompanied by a visualization of the process (the Process Map). Each step is then described in more detail, offering a set of key actions for each stage to provide the “know-how” for effective regulatory future-proofing. Real-life examples are provided where appropriate.
     
  2. Good Practices for Implementation presents four overarching implementation areas for companies to consider when assessing their own practices and seeking process improvements for better regulatory adaptation.
     

To better understand the overall future-proofing process:

  • Start with the Future-proofing Framework Background section and the description of the Process Map.
  • In the sections that describe each sub-process, concentrate on the first two sections (detailing “challenges” and “who does and when”)
  • Consider who in your company currently conducts each phase of the future-proofing process, how the information flows, and your role in supporting the effort.
     

To improve a company’s overall system:

  • Use the process map to identify who, when, and how each phase of the future-proofing process is currently conducted.

  • Consult the Good Practices for Implementation section for ideas to make the overall process work better.
  • Consider which phases of the future-proofing process or good practices are missing or could be improved.
     

To improve specific practices:

  • Concentrate on the “key actions” call-out boxes and descriptions in the Future-proofing Framework section.
  • Consult the Good Practices for Implementation section.
Filters & Tags
Research Topic
Identifying and Evaluating the Impact of Regulations throughout the Project Life Cycle
Keywords
Regulatory risks, Risk and opportunity assessment, Regulatory future proofing, Response strategy development, Process map, Compliance implementation, Horizon scanning, Stakeholder engagement, RTPUI01, PUI-01