Skip to Content (custom)

Continuous Assessment of Project Performance

Publication No
IR107-2
Type
Research & Development Product
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1996
Pages
52
Research Team
RT-107
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
All project participants need information to assist them in managing projects. This book describes a process whereby owner, engineer, and construction contractor organizations can use continuous variables (e.g., owner expenditures and construction eff
Key Findings

The software consists of four modules: 1) data input, 2) data normalization, 3) statistical analysis, and 4) graphical report generation. The graphical module generates the S-curves for the successful and less-than successful projects. The software provides the flexibility to analyze data from different perspectives:

  1. Project type (e.g., process plant, manufacturing, and general building)
  2. Project size
  3. Organization type (e.g., owner, contractor, and designer)
  4. Contract strategy for designer and constructor (e.g., lump sum and reimbursable cost)

CAPP provides the framework to collect data for benchmarking purposes as well as provides an aid in pre-project planning. (IR107-2, p. vii)

Below is a sample CAPP output curve for the variable “Actual Owner Expenditures” for a project whose input parameters included: 1) a process plant construction type, 2) a reimbursable designer contract type, 3) a lump-sum construction contractor contract type, and 4) project size less than $900 million.

Since every project is unique, users of the CAPP software must augment the database with data from their own projects. Below is an entry screen for allowing a company to update the database. (IR107-2, p. 9)

IR107-2, Continuous Assessment of Project Performance

This resource describes a process whereby owner, engineer and construction contractor organizations can use continuous variables to predict project outcomes from start of detailed design through construction completion. S-curves were developed for two project outrcome categories:

  • Successful projects, meeting or exceeding budget and schedule expectations
  • Less-than-successful projects, not meeting budget or schedule expectations

This publication has been archived because its associated software is no longer supported.

Filters & Tags
Research Topic
Predictive Tools
Keywords
Predictive Tools, Predicting Success, Assess Project Performance, Identify Critical Procedures, Continuous Performance Improvement, Improved Pre-Project Planning, Corrective Action Planning, Project Performance Measurement, Project Variables, QMS Evolutio