Skip to Content (custom)

Three-Dimensional Computer Models and the Fully Integrated and Automated Project Process for the Man

Publication No
RR152-11
Type
Academic Document
Publication Date
Mar 01, 2000
Pages
205
Research Team
RT-152
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to establish and document the state-of-the-art, develop procedures that will begin to develop a fully integrated and automated system for managing construction project processes. We define the three-dimensional computer
Key Findings

Focusing on industrial, process, and power, the report found that there is much variability in the capabilities and willingness of construction companies to integrate 3D CAD with other systems. This can be affected by owner requirements, in-house engineering capabilities, engineering firm alliances, or other contractual bid positions and/or terms.

It was found that sophistication evolves as project team members use this technology on more and more projects. However, if adoption is viewed as a track or trend, it would look something like the figure presented here:


Generally, when an organization begins using a three-dimensional computer model and associated databases on the construction site, its use will be limited. As the project teams gain experience, the usage increases and the process becomes more efficient and integrated. It will become apparent as the industries use three-dimensional computer models, which projects benefit most from this integration and automation technology.
(RR152-11, p. 3-1)
This research looked at the more mature end of the sophistication scale with the thought that today’s leading edge will be tomorrow’s standard. It was observed that the 3D model could be used as early as the pre-project planning phase through startup. Activities ranged from simple reviews that afforded enhanced visualization to complex 4D scheduling tasks and lifting simulations. Also, scope definitions become better with attribute data and faster and more reliable material take-off information.

Ultimately, it was conceded that few, if any, construction organizations were using most of the concepts presented as current “state of the practice,” but many had adopted components. The trend and prediction was for increasing adoption of these tools and integrations.

Refer to “On the Horizon” epilogue on page 3-25 of Research Report (RR152-11) for a detailed list of needed functions that were as of yet part of the “state of the practice.”
(RR152-11, p. 3-6)