Skip to Content (custom)

Productivity Benchmarking Summary Report

Publication No
BMM2011-1
Type
Research & Development Product
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2011
Pages
43
Research Team
BMM-Productivity
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract
Increasing global competition and the diminishing pool of skilled construction craft workers have put unprecedented pressure on the U.S. construction industry to effectively use its resources and workforce. Productivity measurements capture how well r
Key Findings
Construction activates occur in a constantly changing environment, therefore construction productivity is affected by a wise spectrum of factors. Figures 18 and 19 show that substantial productivity differences between different project attributes are observed, including project type, size, and nature. (BMM2011-1, p. 25)

{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2fBMM2011_1Figure19.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
Productivity benchmarking should be done at the appropriate level in order to be meaningful. For example, productivity for pouring concrete foundations varies considerably depending on the size of the foundation, as Figure 19 shows. (BMM2011-1, p. 24)
Engineering and construction productivity has different meanings for different organizations. The CII BM&M committee defined engineering and construction as shown in Figure 1. (BMM2011-1, p. 3)
The CII Productivity Benchmarking Program measure productivity in six engineering disciplines and eight construction disciplines. (BMM2011-1, p. 4)
Filters & Tags
Best Practice
Research Topic
Benchmarking & Metrics Productivity Report
Keywords
Productivity, Benchmarking, Construction Productivity, Engineering productivity